Sign up for our newsletters    

Sign up for our newsletters   

Baltimore City Paper home page.

New Maryland Cycling Laws Go Into Effect Friday

September 29, 2010
By

The 2010 Maryland General Assembly, with substantial prodding and guidance from advocacy group One Less Car, managed to pass new bicycle legislation—some fairly substantial, some just for show—and this Friday it goes into effect. With some help from the Washington Area Bicyclist Association, let’s take a moment to recap the changes.

The 3-foot passing law

The gist of the law is that motorists are now required to give cyclists 3 feet of clearance when passing. Unfortunately, the law doesn’t have the teeth it needs. The main problem: the 3-foot law has an exemption for roads that are too narrow to allow 3 feet of clearance safely. In this case, drivers are allowed to pass cyclists with less than 3 feet, which is in itself unsafe. But only to the cyclists.

Cyclists no longer have to ride on the shoulder

Ridiculous as it sounds, cyclists used to be required to take the road shoulder when it was “smooth” enough—which effectively made riding in traffic illegal on roads with a shoulder. Sensibly, this law has been repealed. Cyclists, however, still have to ride in a bike lane where there is one—no matter how much of an unmaintained death trap it may be.

Balanced funding for cyclists and pedestrians

The general idea is that Maryland is now required to give “an appropriate balance of funding” for pedestrian and cycling facilities alongside new highway construction; also: “‘increas[ing] accessibility for the greatest number of pedestrians and bicycle riders’ in transit-oriented areas.”

Sidewalk and Bike Path Construction

This common-sense law requires the state to improve or build sidewalks or bike paths where their absence is “’a substantial public safety risk or significant impediment to pedestrian access.’”

Tags: , ,

  • Anonymous

    How about a law requiring cyclists to not ride in the middle of the road? or the middle of road tandem?
    There is a kind of arrogance with some cyclists that is probably the cause of many accidents.
    I am a cyclist and hope more cities in the U.S. will be more like Europe but; I remind myself all the time, no matter how “right” I am or even if the law is on my side
    - ride very defensively
    - look around you and in your mirrors all the time
    - give way to cars and trucks even if you are legally right in your actions.
    It is not worth it to be hit or cause an accident just to prove your point!

  • Dukiebiddle

    “give way to cars and trucks even if you are legally right in your actions. ”

    Yielding right of way is dangerous. Your advice is bad. Your advice in practice would lead to more road danger and injury. The rule of tonnage is for ships in a harbor. The rules of the road are right of way. You’re putting us all in greater danger by creating an assumption that we’ll get out of drivers’ way when they want us out of their way.

  • Babo

    Why are cyclists so opposed to riding on the city created bike path along Falls Road? (As Falls Rd. runs along the Jones Falls, in between Hampden and Maryland Ave) I see more cyclists riding on the road then on the path. The path is paved and looks to be in good surface condition. I drive that stretch of road daily, and there have been days when I feel my safety (as well as the safety of the bikers) has been unnecessarily compromised by cyclists impeding traffic on both sides of the road, often occurring at the same time. I’m all for sharing the road when its necessary but when there is a path – one created just for bikes – cyclists should use it.

  • FasterThanU

    Babo, that path is a joke. It’s too narrow for the speed you gain down the hill. Most paths in the city may look god in one area but as you travel along them they become increasingly dangerous in some places. Some are very rough in areas besides being dangerous for the speeds we travel they also wear out our bikes. As result I avoid them for the most part and choose to ride in the street where it’s safer. Most driver’s I’ve encountered on the road are understanding and don’t honk like crazy. Well, there was this one time…but I’ll leave it alone. For the most part cyclists are much faster in the city than drivers and that’s another reason why we take over the road. You can get pissed, honk like crazy, cuss us out, but we’ll always leave you behind at the light. Happens all the time.

  • anoncitizen

    okay so if we give bicyclists 3 feet on the side of the road and it causes us to choose between crossing a double yellow line or going more than 20 miles under the speed limit which of the laws should we break?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jack-Enright/1846641041 Jack Enright

    Cars and trucks are dangerous due to Newtons Law. Energy=mass x velocity. A truck weighing 25 tons x2000lbs= (50000lbs+ 300 for GMOdriver) x (70mph)= 3521000mile pounds/hour, we need to covert into newtons,ask a physicist, i sold my physics book, anyway lets say 3.5 x10 to6th power energy units. A bicycle would compare: 25lbs + 150lbs= 175 lbs for Bike, so round out to 200lbs x 20mph= 4000 lbs miles/ hr or 2tons of force. A car: 4000 x 70= 280000= 140 tons. Truck = 1750 tons. Maybe this is why there is a problem with people being roadkill. There should be a law requiring that all trucks go 10mph below the speed limit everywhere in the country. The reason cars go so fast is to avoid the trucks. The trucks go so fast because they can. bicyclists are brave souls if they venture out into a highway, I am one of those people, do not tread on me. If you need more info on this subject, I suggest you read Steppenwolf by Herman Hesse. Thanks Mike Byrne for a well written article. It is nice to know that there are a few people out there looking out for us. GO WILD!

  • Jeff

    Name a single road with a minimum speed limit that bicycles are allowed on.

  • http://www.bicycleaccidentsie.com/cycling-accidents/ Cycling Accidents

    Every year about one quarter of the cyclists killed or injured are children. & around two quarters of cyclists killed have major head injuries. main reason given for the collisions between motor vehicles and bicycles in cycling traffic accidents is that the driver simply did not notice the cyclist when making a manoeuvre. But now new cycling laws go into effect that is motorists are now required to give cyclists 3 feet of clearance when passing threw. I think it saves life of cyclists.

  • babo

    FasterThanU, I have no problem sharing that road as well as any other road w/you folks, I was just wondering what made the path so unappealing. So, thanks for the explanation, much appreciated :)

  • http://security-wire.com/08/how-to-remove-red-cross-antivirus-rogue-anti-spyware.html Remove Red Cross Antivirus

    Thanks for your update!

  • Lucky

    Will the Maryland police enforce such laws? I was hit broadside a few months ago in a bike lane by a left turning, non signaling driver turning into a church parking lot (daylight). The cop did not issue a ticket to the driver even though the driver did not yield to oncoming traffic. The older gentleman admitted fault and his insurance is covering but the Germantown policeman pretty much told me in a subsequent conversation that I should not be riding on Darnestown road even though it has good bike lanes and signage and that yes if the driver had hit a car in the same circumstances, he would have issued a ticket. I was injured substantially but not life threatening and am lucky it was a small car with a soft hood and that I did not land on my head after being thrown. IF I get back on the road, I will have flashing lights.

  • Anonymous

    If it really means that much to you that the older gentleman should be charged, have your lawyer contact the district attorney. If that goes nowhere, contact the state attorney general on the matter. But, the older gentleman did admit a mistake and his insurance is covering you so… he seems to have made you whole again?
    The flashing lights are a good idea.

  • Anonymous

    If it really means that much to you that the older gentleman should be charged, have your lawyer contact the district attorney. If that goes nowhere, contact the state attorney general on the matter. But, the older gentleman did admit a mistake and his insurance is covering you so… he seems to have made you whole again?
    The flashing lights are a good idea.

  • A car driver

    The cycling laws are bullcrap. All that extra taxpayers money used for pikes/peds? I say if we allow bikes to use the roads make them register their bikes and tag them. Paying a registration and tag fee. Why shoud they get to use the roads for free? They should just stick to parks, parking lots and trails…roads are built for motorized vehicles….sidewalks are for pedestrians.

  • biker

    Mr. Cabdriver, do you think all of the public monetary, social and environmental costs of your cab flying around all day long are internalized by your registration and tag fee. As a cyclist, I am the one subsidizing you. Do you think all road maintenance is covered with tag fees? Try my taxes.
    Im sorry you immigrated here from across the world to work a mind numbing job, but its because our car obsessed culture would rather exploit 400 of you than maintain a decent public transportation system in Baltimore. Anyone ever wonder if we could pay honest wages to Americans to work trolleys or light rail instead of lining the pockets of the cab monopoly?
    And by the way, keep opening your door into the bike lane by Penn Station and you will feel a U bolt eventually.

  • DZeigler

    Granted, there is the path down there, it is not very well maintained nor wide enough for multiple cyclists to be on the path at the same time, especially if they are going in opposite directions. The path is also used by runners and other pedestrians, who have yelled at me multiple times for “getting in their way”. A few times I’ve been told BY THE PEDESTRIANS to get off the path and ride on the shoulder (I don’t know if you’ve SEEN the shoulder on Falls Rd by Jones, but it not the most friendly). Regardless, Baltimore needs more bike lanes, especially on high-traffic streets like Charles St and Howard St, especially in the Bolton Hill/MICA/Mt Royal areas. Charles Village and the Hopkins campus area are prime examples of how to deal with cyclists and constructing bike lanes.

    Sadly though, because Baltimore and most cities in MD are colonial cities, adding bike lanes to most of these roads wouldn’t be worth it to the cities themselves….so on to the shoulders!

  • motorcyclist

    They should not be on the ROAD for any reason.
    It is an accident waiting to happen    my 2 cents
    Build another lane for them and tax them for it   DONE

  • Michael Byrne

    Thanks for your 2 cents. Cyclists pay taxes on existing roads, all of them, and a good number they aren’t allowed on. Arguably, given relative impacts over 360 degrees, they pay an already out-sized proportion.